- Panentheism – an Inclusive and Diverse View of God
- Zeus-god
- Theos
- Immersed in God
- Destinations and Journeys
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 7:33 — 6.9MB)
“There are many paths to God.”
A few years ago, the United Methodist church in the US ran an ad campaign that showed people climbing up a mountain. Some took one route, some another; some went directly, others followed a more winding course; some came from the east, the west, the north or the south. In the end, they all arrived at the top of the same mountain.
Modern pluralism has embraced the old saying “We’re all trying to get to the same place” with great enthusiasm.
But I wonder…
Now, don’t worry, I haven’t been converted by the “my way or the hellway” crowd. No, what I wonder about is whether we haven’t missed the point (again) by talking about the destination at all.
I often hear people describe the traditional Christian image of heaven as boring. Who would want to sit around for eternity singing hosannas? How long could you stand it if nothing new ever happened?
For those who live in horrible conditions, whether in a war- or famine-ravaged part of the world; or in squalid or abusive places in the most advanced societies on the planet, I can understand how a few eons of peace and quiet might be appealing. Not to mention justly earned. But even for them, would an eternity of quietude be satisfying?
There’s another old saying that I like – It’s not the destination, it’s the journey.
What if the point isn’t to reach a “goal” but rather to engage in a journey? A journey without end.
Regardless of whether it’s called “heaven” or “Nirvana” or “at-one-ment” or “Cosmic Unity” or anything else; whether it’s traditional religion or New Age spirituality; it always seems as though we express faith in terms of a goal to strive for.
And there’s the problem. If we’re concentrating on our destination, then everything we do between here and there is simply a means to an end.
I took a trip last summer with my daughter. We drove across Canada to see my sons. One lives in Alberta, the other in British Columbia. I live in Ontario. Unfortunately, I miscalculated the distances (using an American Google map which talks in those quaint “miles” things, and then converting to kilometers, is not recommended). The result was that we left later than we should have and ended up in a mad dash across the country in order to get to our destination on time. The places I had planned to stop, the people I had planned to see, sped by the open window while I snapped pictures and my daughter wondered how many shots of snow-covered mountains one really needed to put on Facebook.
The destination was all that mattered.
The thing is, from a purely human, materialistic point of view, that makes perfectly good sense. We only had a limited amount of time. If I had to choose between looking at dinosaur bones or the north shore of Lake Superior, and playing with my grandchildren and hugging my sons and daughter-in-law, there was no contest. The destination won.
But faith isn’t like that.
As much as I liked the United Methodist mountain-as-many-paths metaphor, I’ve come to realize that it missed the mark as well.
It’s not the destination, it’s the journey.
In fact, we should turn the image around. We all start from the same point. We come into the world in the same way, with no preconceived ideas of what the world, or God, are like.
From that common starting point, we fan out in all directions. None of us experiences the world, or God, in exactly the same way. Good fortune or bad, loving family or aching loneliness, celebrity, notoriety, or anonymity; for each and every one of us, a path as distinct as our fingerprints.
From that perspective, the mountain is not a good metaphor. In fact, it could be downright depressing. It conjures up an image of moving “away from” the point of unity. It seems to say that, as we go through life we get farther and farther away from God.
Which, I hope I can hear you saying, is just wrong. We know that we’re not moving away from God. We know it because God doesn’t move away from us. God is part of us, now and always.
So instead of a mountain, or paths (many or one), let’s try a different metaphor.
We are like fish. We’re constantly surrounded by the “ocean” of God’s Spirit. We breathe it in, it gives us life. No matter where we go or what we do, God is there. We need no “destination” to be one with God because God was, is and always shall be, one with us.
But to experience God more fully we need to swim. We need to explore. We need to move in a myriad of different directions; in three dimensions. That’s the only way we can encounter more of God.
If we stay in the same pool in which we were spawned, it isn’t that we won’t “reach our destination.” We’ll still know God – in whatever way God is expressed in that place. Whether through small eddies that bring the taste of salt; or in the warmth of still waters heated by the sun.
But we’ll never know the crash of the surf, or the rushing of a waterfall, or the magnificence of a calving glacier. Those are also part of the “ocean” in which we live and move and have our being.
There aren’t many paths to God. Nor is there just one path to God. There is only learning about the limitless diversity in the ocean of Creation that is still only a partial expression of all that God is.
And even when we inevitably reach the time when we can journey no farther, we don’t need to be concerned about the destination. Because our “destination”, our God, has been with us the whole time.
Enjoy the journey.
![]()
If you found this column of value, I hope that you’ll consider sharing it by clicking the links below, or by emailing a link to someone you think might also enjoy it.
Reposted with permission –
As someone who has always lived near water, indeed one who seeks it out, the metaphor resonated deeply for me.
We humans understand so little about our world and ourselves that whether we want to acknowledge it or not, we are all on a journey and the destination is unknown. If we can acknowledge this reality, perhaps we could prevent the absolutist blundering and the destruction of things we have not seen because we blind ourselves to the possibility of the unknown.
Also wanted to say, thank you David, this was a wonderful read.
This comment was posted on the United Church of Canada's Wondercafe in response to this essay by Linda
Linda also noted –
We recently got HD TV and since the best thing, actually the only good thing IMHO, about HD is the nature programming I have been watching a number of programmes on the ocean. Almost all of them mention that we – that is the human we – have discovered only 5% of the oceanic world. New discoveries are being made all the time, particularly in the deep sea.
There was some fellow – whose name I can't remember as my memory is like the ocean, vast and unfathomable even to myself – but I do remember him saying that we go about exploring the deep sea in the wrong way: descending with noisy machinery and bright lights, thinking that disturbing a dark silent world will return results. He developed a vessel that travels quietly with minimal light and thus discovers a world not seen before, not because it was not there but because it fled from the blinding light.
Reposted with permission –
One thing I like about this metaphor as I meditate on it more is that I haven't come across many really good metaphors in my reading about process theology and panentheism. Metaphors, that is, that are very accessible and that aren't couched in pages of intellectual discussion. Yes, that kind of theology has a place, but if you want a theological position to be understood and accepted by a broader audience, intellectual discussions won't cut it. This one captures much of the essence of panentheism in a very simple and accessible image. And yet, it's not too simplistic, either. One can delve into it, finding new meanings in it and ways to explain various facets of faith with it.
This comment was posted on the United Church of Canada's Wondercafe in response to this essay by David
Reposted with permission –
I like the metaphor of ocean as well. It makes me think of leaving a shore and arriving at another. But people are also leaving the further shore and and arriving at this shore. We meet on the journey or we pass on the journey or we wave on the journey but the journey is always ongoing. We all experience God(in one way or another) on the voyage.
This comment was posted on the United Church of Canada's Wondercafe in response to this essay by "CrazyHeart"
Reposted with permission –
My favourite part of "journeying" is to not have the journey itself set – it's always interesting to experience changes in plans for one reason or another. Something on a route may suggest itself as a place to visit, while not being on the original itinerary, and to miss out on or ignore the impulse to travel there may mean missing out on something very special – an experience that takes one out of the ordinary and transports one to something that challenges, or uplifts or inspires or maybe even disappoints.
It's the same with God – it is good to have a relationship that is "open" to travelling where the spirit or the call leads. Often we find God off the beaten path and are richer for that experience.
I really like your essay, David, and especially the ocean images, since being on oceans and some form of water – lakes, rivers, islands surrounded by water – has become an essential part of my life. Sometimes the seas are calm, sometimes they are in turmoil – like our relationship with God and each other.
This comment was posted on the United Church of Canada's Wondercafe in response to this essay by Arlene
Reposted with permission –
Beauty essay, David. I especially liked:
"There aren’t many paths to God. Nor is there just one path to God. There is only learning about the limitless diversity in the ocean of Creation that is still only a partial expression of all that God is."
Beauty. If we are all waves in this great ocean of diversity, we are individual in a certain sense but in it together in an "ocean" sense…
This comment was posted on the United Church of Canada's Wondercafe in response to this essay by Penny
David, I think you would enjoy reading Karen Armstrong's latest book, perhaps her best yet: "The Case for God," (A.A. Knopf, 2009). It is a very erudite history of humanity's journey for that elusive goal of the search for a satisfactory understanding of the Transcendent Reality we call God.
John.
Thanks John. It is, and I did. :)
I very much liked the way that she explored the difference between "mythos" and "logos". I'm not sure I've seen the distinction expressed quite that way before. Very readable.
Reposted here with permission:
That is a very good metaphor. In fact as I was reading your essay it donned on me that there is no destination, only journey. Time never stops so how can we have a destination? Destination implies accomplishment and finality. An End. There is no end of finality to time. And if the universe will continue to big bang and big crunch and big bang and big crunch then there will be no destination. Because time would effectively be infinite and so to would the journey be infinite. Which is totally in line with your metaphor. I also like your metaphor because like the ocean, our journies can be polluted.
This comment was posted on the United Church of Canada's Wondercafe in response to this essay by "Omni"
Reposted here with permission:
Well, if God does not exist, then neither many paths to God nor one path to God will lead to God. Then no path can possibly lead to the nonexistent God.
But what if God is ineffable or incomprehensible? What if, as in unitheism, everything is God? Then no path can possibly lead to God because we are God.
Getting IT
IT is we; we are IT.
We can't comprehend IT without experiencing IT,
But we can experience IT without comprehending IT—
For we are IT!
IT reveals everything;
IT explains nothing.
The interpretations
Of ITs revelations,
Are our creations.
This comment was posted on the United Church of Canada's Wondercafe in response to this essay by "Arminius"
Reposted here with permission:
You are so getting cited in a future sermon. In my thoughts on the "life as a journey" metaphor, I've been pushing the idea of moving away from a "commute" model, where we are just trying to get from the beginning to the end of the journey and focussing very much on the destination, towards a "tourist" or "voyage of exploration" model, where the goal in learn about and experience life fully by taking the road less travelled and exploring new places (i.e. new ideas, new stories, new truths, and so on).
The sermon I did on the subject was called "Exploring the Dark Cave of Life" and, alas, it was one that I preached from talking points and have never fully written out else I would post it in my blog on WC as a response to your piece. I think your metaphor fits beautifully with where I've been going recently, though, and if I ever revisit that sermon, I'll have to take account of your metaphor and work it in somehow.
This comment was posted on the United Church of Canada's Wondercafe in response to this essay by "Mendalla"