This reflection is drawn from Ephesians 4:1-16 and Rev. John Shearman’s Lectionary Analysis for Year B Proper 13.
Both literalists and atheists claim that passages like this one in Ephesians makes an exclusive claim for Christianity as the only way to “salvation.”
They’re probably right.
Literalists say it to “prove” that their form of Christianity is better than any other religion. Atheists say it to “prove” that Christianity is just another superstitious cult.
If the texts we call “sacred” are to have meaning for us today, we need to move beyond either perspective.
The author of Ephesians was writing in the earliest periods of the church. Whether or not it was written by Paul, its author and other church founders were attempting to turn “the Way” into a religion. That was even more true a few hundred years later when the church’s leaders got together to decide which bits of writing would be included in what we now call the New Testament.
So Ephesians was written to a particular audience at a particular time for a particular reason.
And there’s nothing wrong with that.
But if we don’t either a) accept it at face value or b) dismiss it out of hand, what should we to do with it? How do we approach it so that it’s relevant to our faith lives today?
The writer says that there is one Body (soma) and one Spirit (pneuma) and one God (Theos). And that we are all part of that Body, and endowed with that Spirit. No exceptions.
“one God and ‘pater’ (Parent/Source, not “Father”) of all, who is above all and through all and in all.”
All of us. All of Creation. Always.
When I read passages like this one, I don’t hear a preacher trying to convert people to a new religion. I hear a follower of “the Way” trying to awaken people to the reality of the agapé relationship with Theos – with all of Creation – that the Message of the Christ embodies.
A relationship that, far from being broken, was, and is, inseverable.
The author of Ephesians goes on to say that some people are called to be “apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, some pastors and teachers.”
But only “until all of us come to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to maturity, to the measure of the full stature of Christ.”
Not the unity of the religion; the unity of the faith. Not the acceptance of one dogma or another. The dismissal of all doctrine and dogma; replaced by our maturity to the full measure of the Christ.
We’re told that we need to speak the truth in love. And that, as we grow into the Christ, we will no longer follow one leader or another, or let others interpret our living relationship with God. In fact, we’re told that we shouldn’t let ourselves be “blown about by doctrine.” We’ll act in unity because the Spirit that dwells in each of us will allow us to see the unity that’s always existed between us all.
Writings such as Ephesians may have originally been intended to encourage the growth of the church. But the growth of our agapé relationship was never dependent on the “supremacy” of any religion, Christianity or any other.
Rather, it has always been dependent on our individual recognition of the Spirit of God within all of those around us and within all of Creation.
Once we recognize the reality of that, we become immune to the “trickery” and “scheming” of those who want to incite hatred and bigotry, persecution or exploitation. We become one with each other, with Creation, and with God.
One Body.
One Spirit.
One Creation.
Thank God.
That's a very good take on the message of Ephesians. The writer of Ephesians was probably a late 1st or early 2nd century church leader from the second generation of Christians. So building up "the Body of Christ", i.e. the church of his day, certainly was his main purpose. His take on Paul's message to the first generation of Christians believers was quite accurate too. When the mission to the Greek and gentile world was just beginning a genration earlier, Paul's chief aim was to show that the God revealed in the Hebrew experience and scriptures was the One God, creator and redeemer of all. (See Nanos, Mark D. "The Mystery of Romans." Fortress Press, 1996) Thus unity among people of all faith traditions would only be achieved through following "the Way." That is still true today, but only if there is total inclusiveness. The question remains, however, "How to bring this about in a respectful and peaceful way?"
thanks John. I think it's important for people to understand the context of our sacred text. As always, you do a great job in fleshing it out.____As to the question you ask. For me at least, the answer lies in getting back to the core message of the Way – that it's our actions toward one another and the world we live in, rather than the doctrine we follow, that enables that inclusiveness.____There's a challenge there of course, since some, in all religions, fervently believe that their way is the only way. For me, that's one of the "evils" that we're called to resist in the quest for justice.
A very nice commentary – succinct and right on. With your permission, a lot of it may find its way into tomorrow’s sermon.
Thank you so much for your kind words Susan. Most certainly, you are welcome to use any part of any post here.
I apprieciate you taking the time to comment. It's always uplifting to know that my few words are helpful in some way.
David