John Shearman's Lectionary

INTRODUCTION TO THE SCRIPTURE

Sixth Sunday of Easter

May 9, 2010

 ACTS 16: 9-15. This important transitions story marks the beginning of what scholars call a series of eyewitness accounts in which the pronouns switch from “they” to “we.” Scholars have assumed that the man who appeared to Paul in the night was Luke himself, the presumed author of Acts.

The passage also marks the beginning of the Christian mission in Europe. Of all the congregations Paul founded, he had warmest feelings for the Philippians, as his letter to that community shows.  

 PSALM 67. This simple hymn of praise may well have been a thanksgiving prayer after a successful harvest had brought relief from a severe famine. The psalm may have been sung antiphonally during the Feast of Tabernacles, the Jewish thanksgiving festival. The untranslatable word, Selah, may have indicated a place for cymbals to sound.    

 REVELATION 21:10, 22-22:5. In John’s closing vision, he saw God’s holy city of the redeemed, for which God and Christ provide eternal light and life. A vision by the prophet Ezekiel and the Garden of Eden provided Old Testament models for the New Jerusalem. All believers may share this beatific vision made possible by the visible presence of God and Christ. Note that the whole scene takes place on earth, there is not temple or church, and God’s dwelling is among us, not “in the distant heavens” or outer space.

 JOHN 14:23-29. In these words attributed to Jesus John summed up the essential meaning of the Christ coming among us. His promise to send his Holy Spirit to dwell in, guide and strengthen his disciples is still valid. He is the ever present Lord available to everyone in all of life’s daily experiences.

JOHN 5:1-9. (Alternate)   This alternate reading presents us with the narrative of another miracle that leads to an expository discourse about Jesus’ authority deriving from God rather than from the legal restrictions of the Jewish Sabbath.

A MORE COMPLETE ANALYSIS

 ACTS 16:9-15. This is one of the important transitions in the story Luke is telling in Acts. It is the beginning of what scholars call a series of eyewitness accounts in which the pronouns switch from “they” to “we.” It has often been questioned whether Luke himself was the man who appeared to Paul in the night. But debate about the source of the “We” passages has generally concluded with Ramsay’s thesis of 1896 that these came from the author of the two volumes, the Gospel of Luke and Acts traditionally attributed to Luke.

It is significant that all the eyewitness passages (this one, together with 20:5-19, 21:1-18 and 27:1-28:16) include extensive sea voyages. This has prompted some analysts to suggest that Luke had access to a travel diary, perhaps his own or that of some other companion of Paul. Secondly, the effect of the “we” passages, according to Brevard Childs, “is to bring a broader confirmation of the apostolic witness and ground the material in a communal experience.” This literary device is distinct from other literary techniques Luke uses, but serves the same theological purpose of witnessing to the common faith proclaimed by all the apostles. It “render(s) the testimony in a particular fashion which serves to bridge the gap between the original author and the subsequent reader.” (Childs, Brevard S. The New Testament As Canon – An Introduction. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985.)

Of all the congregations with which Paul was associated, he had warmest feelings for the Philippians, as his letter to that community showed. Yet unlike his visits to the Jewish Diaspora in Galatia, he did not find a synagogue in Philippi. Was there no Jewish community in that important Roman city? Or were they too few in number, since only ten male Jews were required to form a synagogue? Lydia appears to have been a Gentile “worshipper of God” (vs. 14) in whose home Paul made his headquarters?

The Greek word thus translated, sebomenos (Eng. = devout), appears several times elsewhere in Acts along with phoboumenos (Eng. = God-fearing) describing Gentiles who demonstrated sincere spiritual concerns. (cf. 10:2; 13:43, 50; 17:4, 17; 18:7). It is also possible that “a certain woman named Lydia” actually means “a woman from Lydia,” an ancient kingdom which under Rome became part of the province of Asia in which the prosperous city of Thyatira was located. If so, she may be identified with either Euodia or Syntyche of Phil. 4:2.

It also appears that she was a business woman or a widow who had taken over her former husband’s trade, as identified by being “a seller of purple.” Purple was the most valuable of ancient dyes, the source of which was a mollusk, each shade created by using different species of mollusk. The Hebrews valued the colour highly as a symbol of distinction, wealth and royalty. However we hypothesize about such minutiae, one thing is certain: in this instance, Paul’s testimony in Philippi marks the beginning of the Christian mission in Europe of which we too are the heirs.

 PSALM 67. This simple hymn of praise may well have been a thanksgiving prayer after a successful harvest had brought relief from a severe famine. (vs. 6)  It most likely found an appropriate place in the feast of Tabernacles (Succoth) prominently observed after the Exile. As a time for singing and dancing, this festival featured many liturgical compositions which may also have included such Psalms as 113-119 and 136.

The untranslatable word, Selah, which occurs twice in the text, may have indicated a place for cymbals to sound. The superscription indicates that stringed instruments were also used as accompaniment. Human voices in chorus, however, made the main music of worship in the temple. The psalm would have been sung antiphonally.

Another notable quality of this psalm is its missionary character drawn from such sources as Deutero-Isaiah and Jonah. God’s goodness to Israel, so visible in the abundant harvest, should be a revelation to all the world of God’s righteous ways in dealing with those who trust God. Accordingly, all nations should join Israel in reverence and praise.

REVELATION 21:10, 22-22:5. In John’s closing vision, he sees the New Jerusalem, God’s holy city of the redeemed, for which God and Christ provide eternal light and life. New Testament authors generally used Old Testament references to tell of how God’s redemptive purpose would be fulfilled through Christ. The models for the New Jerusalem were a vision by the prophet Ezekiel (47:1-12) Ezekiel and the Garden of Eden (Gen. 2:9-10). This beatific vision is made possible for all believers by the visible presence of God and Christ.

Quite rightly, the reading excludes the dimensions and description of the holy city, for these are symbolic. In fact, there is a double symbolism in that the city is also a bride bejewelled for her wedding.  So conservative an interpreter as Dr. Billy Graham has said that this passage does no more than describe heaven as a beautiful place where the faithful will live eternally with and should not be taken literally. But this is not heaven which John envisions.

Note especially where 21:10 places this eternal city of the redeemed. Most conceptions of the future life of the redeemed relocate earthbound creation and humanity to heaven. John does the very opposite: the heavenly city comes down to earth. There but one meaning for this statement. As Professor George Caird has pointed out: “To the crack of doom Jersualem can never appear otherwise than coming down out of heaven, for it owes its very existence to the condescension of God and not to the building up of men.”

The absence of the temple also has considerable significance. It symbolizes two essential aspects of Jewish thought and religion. One the one hand, it clarified the distinction between the holy and the common, the clean and the unclean. The temple was holy in that it had been set aside for the special service of God, separated from everyday, common use. On the other hand, the temple also represented the presence of God in the midst of God’s people, and God’s claim on the whole of the secular world. The fact that there is now no temple in the holy city means that the divine presence is no longer confined to a sanctuary set apart, but pervades the whole city and the world it represents.

Still more must be said about John’s vision of the holy city. The disappearance of the old and the condescension of the new conveys a dynamic redemptive message. Into the holy city come the nations and kings of the earth. Those who once trampled the holy city under foot have now come with willing tribute to adorn it. As Caird wrote: “Nothing from the old order which has value in the sight of God is debarred from entry into the new…. The treasure that men find laid up in heaven turns out to be the treasures and the wealth of the nations, the best they have known and loved redeemed of all imperfections and transfigured by the radiance of God….Nowhere in the New Testament do we find a more eloquent statement than this of the all-embracing scope of Christ’s redemptive work.”  (G.B. Caird. The Revelation of St. John the Divine. Black’s New Testament Commentary. London: Adam & Charles Black, 1966. p. 278-280.)

 JOHN 14:23-29. We cannot tell if any of these words attributed to Jesus were part of the remembered tradition of what he actually said.  John appears to have cobbled together several disjointed themes within this much loved chapter of his Gospel. The way in which the editors of the lectionary have separated the various readings only serves to make the problem worse. There seems to no reason to separate Judas’ question (vs. 22) from the answer Jesus gave (vs. 23-24), nor to isolate that question and answer from the preceding segment about keeping the commandments to receiving the Father’s love. There is, however, some justification for the separation of the next segment (vs. 25ff) which the NRSV designates by a new paragraph. The Interpreter’s Bible, vol. 8 (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1952,  p. 707-715) seems to have done better by placing vss. 18-31 in three distinct sections: vss. 18-24, “the threefold union;” vss. 25-26, “the second Paraclete saying;” (the first Paraclete saying is in vss. 15-17) and vss. 27-31, “peace, joy and security.” In many respects, all such distinctions are speculative, for the original Greek text had no paragraphing or punctuation whatsoever and was written in capital letters.

In this particular reading, John was dealing with the issue of the church living in a hostile world at the end of the 1^st century CE without the visible presence of Christ. He told his community through these words attributed to Jesus that obedience and love are the conditions ruling the life of the church and therefore guaranteeing the sense of Christ’s living presence as God’s representative. He then went on to make an additional promise that the Holy Spirit would teach them and bring to their remembrance all that Christ had said to them. Was John here speaking about the Jesus’ story he was then actually writing down for his community? And did he also refer to what Calvin many centuries later would describe as “the inner testimony of the Spirit” enabling us to interpret holy scripture?

The final parting words John had Jesus speak have brought peace and security to countless distressed Christians. John obviously regarded the trials his community might be facing as similar to that which Jesus himself faced the night he was betrayed. The closer he came to the cross, the greater was Jesus’ sense that his ultimate of security lay in loving obedience to God’s will, not in his own desire for a longer life. This did not in any way remove him from the consequences of what others like Judas Iscariot, Caiaphas or Pilate would do. This was no facile counsel like “love God and do what you will,” as Augustine said five centuries later. Rather, this was the ultimate act of faith. For the disciples, for John’s community and for us, this is still so, as vs. 29 assures us.

JOHN 5: 1-9. (Alternate)   The reason for this alternate reading is not immediately obvious. It presents us with the narrative of another miracle that leads to an expository discourse about Jesus’ authority deriving from God rather than from the legal restrictions of the Jewish Sabbath.

John is very specific about the location of the pool called Bethzatha, but modern archeology has never satisfactorily discovered it. His description of the porticoes gives some background details about that fill out the where many invalids sheltered awaiting for the moment when an eruption of the water would provide a magical cure.

At first glance, Jesus’ challenge to the paralytic seems uncaring. Why else would he have laid there for thirty-eight years? Or is this just an extended period of time that John used to make the miracle seem all the more astonishing? The paralytic’s response seems pathetic, but still emphasized his credulity in the legend that the pool had magical powers.

Jesus’ initiative in selecting this man among many at the pool focused attention on his authority what God desires for every invalid: health of body, mind and spirit. Performing this miracle on the Sabbath set up the issue John wished to discuss at greater length: Jesus’ conflict with the Jews about his authority over all of life.

Additional Preaching Points:

• ACTS 16: 9-15.  Despite Lydia’s appearance only in this passage, creating a fictional background story about her could be a useful means of introducing the significant role women played in the ministry of Paul. Paul’s letters often referred to specific women who became leaders in the church or whose quarrels mitigated the appeal of the gospel and the mission of the church. This would counter the negative references to women often raised in some circles today against the role of women in leadership positions in the church or business.

• PSALM 67. Having recently witnessed from afar the 60th    anniversary of the refounding of Israel, we can easily imagine the unrestrained celebrations of the Feast of Tabernacles during which this psalm may have had a significant part.

Bruce Chilton hypothesized that Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem and angry driving of the moneychangers from the temple actually occurred on the Feast of Tabernacles. The triumphal into Jerusalem entry was a parade celebrating that feast, not a political statement at Passover as the synoptic gospel narrative depicts. The upsetting of the money changer’s tables was Jesus’ protest against the lucrative commercialization of sacrifices which he believed every Jew had the right to present from his own means, however meager. (Chilton, Bruce. Rabbi Jesus: An Intimate Biography. Doubleday, 2000.)

• REVELATION 21-22.  For those who may have missed it, Rev. Ron McCreary, of Gray Memorial United Methodist Church, Tallahassee, FL, commented that John’s vision of the New Jerusalem coming down out of  heaven from God and the assertion that God will tabernacle (NRSV “dwell”) with humankind, is a vision of the answer to the phrase from the Lord’s Prayer, “Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as in heaven.”

This important insight is in keeping with such positive attitude toward history described in the new work of Jeremy Rifkin, The Empathic Civilization. Rifkin presents the view that, in the age of global electronic communication, following the empathic directive traditionally expressed in the Golden Rule is the best way to avoid total disaster through global conflict or environmental neglect.    (See more in Additional Preaching Points accompanying the lessons Fourth Sunday of Easter, April 25, 2010.)

• JOHN 14:23-29. It may seem inviting to link this gospel excerpt with a similar English words “dwelling” and “dwell” used in Revelation 21:3.  But be careful because the Greek words used in each instance were notably different. In John 14, the Greek verb was meno (English = remain; abide in KJV); “make our home” in NRSV); whereas in Revelation, the Greek verb was skéno (English = tabernacle). There was not only a different emphasis, but a significantly different meaning.

 Meno implied an enduring state of being present in the here and now, with a expectancy permanence in the future. Skéno referred to the tent or tabernacle where Yahweh was believed to reside temporarily as a symbol of protection and communion during Israel’s wandering in the wilderness. But in Revelation 21:1 & 22, there was no temple in the New Jerusalem, for it had vanished with the first earth, and God and the Lamb were its temple. Therefore, linking the two passages implies that it is the Spirit that makes the presence of God and Jesus Christ a permanent reality to the Church in every age, not the magnificent temples that we erect “to the glory of God.”

•  JOHN 5: 1-9. (Alternate).  Several sites in ancient Jerusalem have been considered as possible locations for the Pool of Bethesda (Beth-Zatha). A discovery made in 1888 by a German archaeologist best meets the biblical description.  In Jesus’ times it lay on the north side of the Old City walls at the foot of what was then known as Mount Bethzetha. Today it lies within the grounds of property owned by the “White Fathers,” near the Church of St. Anne. This is also close to the Arch of Ecce Home where the Via Dolorosa begins. This site suits well with descriptions by Origen and Eusebius in the 3^rd and 4^th centuries CE. Today tourists are shown this site as the best verified.  

Vs. 4 in the KJV regarding angels disturbing the waters does not exist in the best manuscripts. Scholars regard it as a 2^nd century CE interpolation. It was included in a footnote in the RSV and NRSV. The legend is believed to have risen to explain the phenomenon of a spring occasionally erupting in a ruddy stream of water.

There is doubt as to the pool’s use for the purpose named, the Sheep-Pool in vs. 2. It is believed to come from the practice of sheep being washed in a liturgical ceremony to prove their unblemished quality for sacrifice at the Passover. If so, a nearby gate, no longer visible beneath the massive north walls of the temple precincts, would have given access to the temple for the actual sacrifice.

For more information see here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Fathers

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pool_of_Bethesda

-30-

INTRODUCTION TO THE SCRIPTURE
Ash Wednesday, February 17, 2010

JOEL 2:1-2, 12-17. With the warning sound of trumpets, the prophet sounds the alarm that the fearsome Day of the Lord is at hand. There is still time to repent, though there may still be uncertainty that all the fasting a sacrifices will be sufficient to dissuade Yahweh from punishing wayward Israel.

ISAIAH 58:1-12 . (Alternate) Countering the popular displays of repentance by fasting, the prophet pleads that Israel’s returned exiles make justice their true form of repentance. Only then will the Lord restore their prosperity and rebuild their ruined cities.

PSALM 51:1-17. As the sub-title indicates, this classic psalm of repentance has traditionally been connected with David’s adultery with Bathsheba. Many scholars doubt this reference. It could just as well be read as the sincere expression of penitence by any sinner at any time.

2 CORINTHIANS 5:20b – 6:10. Paul quite rightly linked the Christian message of reconciliation with God to the ministry of every Christian. He cited plainly the many difficulties he had experienced in carrying out this ministry and the plethora of spiritual gifts he had been given to do it.

MATTHEW 6:1-6, 16-21. From the collection of sayings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount comes this insightful observation: The essence of true penitential prayer is to be found in its secretive quality. On the other hand, making a public display for self-centred reasons is the essence of hypocrisy.

A MORE COMPLETE ANALYSIS.

Liturgical and popular practices related to Shrove Tuesday, Ash Wednesday and Lent developed relatively late in the history of the Christian Church. Even in the Roman Catholic tradition, these special days of penitence and spiritual renewal have been widely celebrated only since the year 1000. In recent years, many churches of the Protestant tradition, which rejected them almost totally at the time of the Reformation, have taken them up again. Liturgical practices of penitence, however, have a sound biblical background as the lessons assigned for Ash Wednesday clearly reveal.

JOEL 2:1-2, 12-17. Joel is one of the unknown prophets of the OT. Scholars have noted a close resemblance of his writings with those of the better known 8th century BCE prophet, Amos. Unlike Amos, he was concerned with worship of the temple, most likely the Second Temple of the post-exilic period. Many
scholars believe that his work dates from a relatively peaceful time during the late Persian period, ca. 400 BCE, when the leadership of Israel had, to a considerable extent, fallen to the high priesthood. Joel’s great hope lay in the restoration of the nation to its previously privileged role as the divinely chosen people. He couched this hope in strong apocalyptic terms recalling the declarations of earlier prophets.

With the warning sound of trumpets, the prophet sounds the alarm that the fearsome Day of the Lord is at hand. There is still time to repent, though there May still be uncertainty that all the fasting a sacrifices will be sufficient to dissuade Yahweh from punishing wayward Israel.

The emphasis on liturgical practices in vss. 12, 14 and 15-17 shows how deeply committed Joel was to the traditional ways of showing that penitence was real. On the other hand, vs. 13 contains the classic expression of the Israel’s faith in the divine qualities of grace, mercy, slowness to anger and abounding steadfast love.

ISAIAH 58:1-12. (Alternate) Countering the popular displays of repentance by fasting, the prophet pleads that Israel’s returned exiles make justice for the oppressed their true form of repentance. Only then will the Lord restore their prosperity and rebuild their ruined cities.

In vss. 1-5, after sounding a trumpet (shofar – a ram’s horn) to get the people’s attention, the prophet condemns in the most adamant terms the proffered symbols of repentance. Fasting in particular receives his vituperative censure. Coupled with this, he warns the people that this will not get Yahweh’s attention.

Beginning with vs. 6, he then goes on to delineate the kind of repentance Yahweh seeks: social justice for the oppressed, the homeless and the poor. Only this will receive Yahweh’s blessing and result in Yahweh’s gifts of prosperity thus enabling them to rebuild their ruined cities.

The historical allusions in this passage point to the decades immediately following the return of the exiles from Babylon. Impoverished and dispirited, they failed to recognize that true repentance had to be implemented by a sharing of limited resources. This could be read as a powerful message for our own time when globalization has created a still wider gap between rich and poor. Times like these call for an even greater commitment to social justice, not only within one nation but throughout the global village. Would it not be an appropriate measure of our repentance to increase our gifts to those less fortunate than ourselves – the Haitian disaster relief, for instance – than to “give up” anything else for Lent.

PSALM 51:1-17. As the sub-title indicates, this classic psalm of repentance has traditionally been connected with David’s adultery with Bathsheba. Many scholars doubt this reference, yet it finds persistent expression in many pulpits. The actual historical incident behind the psalm, if any, remains unknown. The final two verses omitted from this reading suggest a post-exilic date when ritual sacrifices would have been offered in the restored temple in Jerusalem. The earlier verses could just as well be read as the sincere expression of penitence by any sinner at any time. Indeed, many a despondent soul has found them helpful in saying what one’s own words cannot say. They open the penitent heart to God.

Many have found the words of vs. 5 very troublesome. The KJV appear to shift blame for one’s evil behaviour on to one’s parents, grandparents and beyond. This may be in keeping with the OT tradition voiced in Exodus 20:5 where “the iniquity of the fathers (is visited) upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate (Yahweh).” (See also Exodus 34:6-8; Number 14:17-19; Deuteronomy 5:8-10) While modern psychology may recognize that behaviour often has roots in family systems of long standing, that is not the import of more recent translations of the text. The NRSV wording, “I was born guilty, a sinner when my mother conceived me,” presents a paraphrase of the Hebrew, which definitely implies parental iniquity. Another view holds that the literal translation anticipates a later Jewish concept of evil inclination. We are all sinners alienated from God and never were anything else.

Many sins remain quite unknown to the sinner. It takes a deep examination of the soul to recognize that some things we do can never be sanctioned by God, although sinners are never beyond sanctification. “A clean heart and a right spirit” do come from an examination of one’s actual relationship with God and the acceptance of divine forgiveness. It results from the work of the Holy Spirit within us (vss. 10-11) and brings more than joy to the forgiven sinner. One remains a sinner, but now as a forgiven sinner one gains a mission. Not only do the sinner’s ways change, but one becomes a messenger of God’s grace for others.

Perhaps more than any other institution in the past century, Alcoholics Anonymous has fulfilled this mission in North American society through its twelve step program. Anyone who has shared in this mission even to a minor extent knows how sacrificial it can be. Vs.17 truly expresses the reward of the acceptable sacrifice. Was this not also what voiced in Romans 12:1-2 and again in the next passage assigned for Ash Wednesday?

2 CORINTHIANS 5:20b – 6:10. Paul quite rightly linked the Christian message of reconciliation with God to the ministry of every Christian. He cited plainly the many difficulties he had experienced in carrying out this ministry and the plethora of spiritual gifts he had been given to do it. Paul’s ministry began when he met the risen Christ on the Damascus Road. We do not know the exact nature of the psychic experience of the encounter, but we do know what followed: a life totally dedicated to bringing the gospel to Jews and Gentiles alike. Wherever he went, he became the perfect example of an ambassador for Christ.

This passage deals with the challenges of such a positive ministry in direct contrast to the negative aspects of Lent that we so often emphasize. The first step is to be reconciled to God oneself. That took a considerable length of time for Paul. It is not possible to discover his exact movements in those early years because the narrative of Acts 9:26-30 do not completely correspond to his own account in Galatians 1:17. In his Corinthians letters, Paul did make a strong case for the severity of his trials as an apostle. In 2 Cor. 6:4-5 he quickly summarizes some of these, but vss. 6-10 balances them with an even longer list of the gifts he had been given to overcome them.

One thinks immediately of 20th century heroes of faith such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela whose lives similarly exemplified what Paul saw as being an ambassador for Christ. It is not the worthiness of character or the depths of one’s penitence, but the spiritual gifts provided by the Holy Spirit that gives such men and women the power to be who they are. Moral authority springs from encountering Christ in what was for Paul and countless others since a life-changing experience that enabled them to change the history of the their own and subsequent times.

MATTHEW 6:1-6, 16-21. From the collection of sayings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount comes this insightful observation: The essence of true penitential prayer is to be found in its secretive quality. On the other hand, making a public display for self-centred reasons is the essence of hypocrisy.

Few of us have a memorable skill in prayer. Even those who practice silent, contemplative prayer often have difficulty concentrating for any length of time. The human mind is so easily distracted by what is happening around us. For this reason, the counsel Jesus gave in this excerpt could be useful to everyone who sincerely desires to experience the presence of God in prayer. He himself took time apart for personal spiritual renewal in prayer in quiet places apart from the crowds that constantly pressed around him.

Jesus was also saying that ostentatious piety, expressed either in the mellifluous words of prayer or the giving of substantial gifts to the poor, only affect one’s spiritual health in negative ways. Those who seek to do this for personal aggrandizement receive just that kind of reward. In the Hebrew language there was no word for what we call “alms.” In that tradition, however, generosity to the poor was both required and praised (e.g. Deut. 15:11; Job 29:11-16). In the Sermon on the Mount, piety and almsgiving are synonymous. Paul urged his communities to make special efforts to remember the poor. Without question, this must be one aspect of a sincere response to God, not the chief means of obtaining such a relationship.

In the second part of this reading, Jesus similarly discredited ostentatious fasting, although that too had been an ancient tradition in Israel. The great liturgical fast occurred on the Day of Atonement. It could be undertaken on other occasions too: in personal mourning, intercession or petition for Yahweh’s aid, or as a national act in the face of some calamity. Total abstinence from food indicated absolute dependence on and submission to Yahweh. As we saw in the reading from Isaiah 58 above, the prophetic view held that whatever moral value fasting might have should be enhanced by compassion for the poor and continual social justice.

It would appear that in Jesus time, despite there being a strong connection between fasting and prayer, the practice had become something of a fetish for the publicly pious. Is our use of ashes spotting the forehead a similar ostentation? Did Jesus direct the main thrust of this passage at the Pharisees in particular? Their meticulous attention to details of the law would have made them a prime target for his sarcasm. He directed his followers to do their fasting in private and with certain aspects of rejoicing. Unlike John the Baptist and the Pharisees, he did not urge them to be too strict about it. Primarily, he recognized it as a spiritual discipline.

Perhaps it was for this reason that the early church adopted the practice, especially in preparation for baptism. By the late 4th century, Cyril of Jerusalem was counseling a forty day pre-baptismal fast prior to Easter, the traditional time for baptizing new catechumens. By the 5th century it had become the subject of discussion as having an apostolic origin. Rightly or wrongly, this was the probable origin of the later Lenten fast. It is not impossible that the general practice of a Lenten fast made a spiritual virtue of a real necessity. During the Early Middle Ages (aka Dark Ages) food production had fallen to such a low level as to force the reduction of food consumption during the late winter and early spring. Our English word Lent itself is no more than a Germanic word for spring when the hours of daylight lengthen.

INTRODUCTION TO THE SCRIPTURE
The Transfiguration – February 14, 2010
Last Sunday After Epiphany

EXODUS 34:29-35. This is an imaginative description of what might have happened after Moses came face to face with God. Moses had been in the very presence of God to receive the commandments. His brother Aaron and all the Israelites knew this because his face shone. This strange phenomenon symbolized that these commandments had come from God, not from Moses himself. The shining presence in God’s messenger represented the divine authority behind the commandments.

PSALM 99. This is the last of a series of psalms used in the temple ritual, which some scholars believe celebrated the enthronement of God as Israel’s ruler at the new year festival. It focuses on God’s justice and praises God for providential and merciful guidance throughout Israel’s history from the time of Moses onward.

2 CORINTHIANS 3:12-4:2. Because Paul had quite another purpose in mind, he reinterpreted the story of Moses covering his shining face with a veil. He declared that God’s authority comes not from the commandments Moses brought to the Israelites, but from the risen Christ who is now present with the church through the gift of the Spirit. So the church is able to speak truthfully and authoritatively for God as we proclaim the gospel.

LUKE 9:29-43. Luke tells of the transfiguration of Jesus with the same Old Testament lesson in mind to make the same point Paul made: Jesus represents God and God’s authority along with Moses and Elijah. The healing of the epileptic child proves that this is no pious hope, but a spiritual reality breaking in upon the natural scheme of things in a distressed world. Our troubled time needs to hear this hopeful message.

A MORE COMPLETE ANALYSIS

EXODUS 34:29-35. The tendency of biblical scholarship since the beginning of historical-critical inquiry has been to dissect the whole of the Pentateuch, including the Book of Exodus, into source documents authored by unknown hands at different periods of Israel’s history and finally edited into a composite whole. This fragmentation detracted from what many scholars now see in the Book of Exodus: one of the foundational books of holy scripture, for Jews and Christians alike.

No one denies that the structure of Exodus is composite; but it also may be seen as a deliberately structured whole designed for a particular theological purpose. In chapters 33 and 34 this purpose becomes clear. In the renewal of the covenant and the presentation of a second set of stone tablets bearing Yahweh’s commandments, the presence of Yahweh among Yahweh’s chosen people is revealed in all its glory. This above all else, despite Israel’s persistent apostasy and the continued opposition of Israel’s enemies, formed the central point around which all subsequent Jewish history, ritual and faith revolved. This passage presents an imaginative description of what might have happened after Moses came face to face with God.

A tent where Moses met face to face with Yahweh (33:7-11) represented the divine shekinah, (usually described as “the radiant glory,” but literally, “the dwelling” or “that which dwells”). In the ensuing dialogue, Yahweh renewed the covenant with Israel based on mercy and grace, not on Israel’s obedience (34:6-7). In this lesson we have a description of how the people of Israel recognized that this had happened: the shekinah was reflected in the shining face of Moses. This strange phenomenon of the shining presence in Yahweh’s messenger symbolized that the commandments and the covenant of promise had come from Yahweh, not from Moses himself.

Much the same phenomenon is used today in democracies where laws are promulgated in the name of the nation as a whole. In Canada or the United Kingdom, the monarch is the symbolic representation of the nation. In the USA, the president fills this role. In ancient Israel, this representation embodied by Moses provided the nation with its unique identity as the chosen people. The commandments thus became the divinely mandated response to this special relationship and the ultimate authority in the daily life of Israel.

The issue confronting us in this text has to do with our authority for representing Jesus Christ and the living God in our daily lives. A growing number of people have turned to meditation as a means of reconnecting their lives with the divine authority they seek to practice. We owe much of the revival of this facet of our Christian tradition to our Roman Catholic ecumenical partners. A number of devotional websites have been created to assist those unfamiliar with this practice. These include such sites as the World Center for Christian Meditation http://www.wccm.org; Dr. Phil St. Romain’s Shalom Place: The Heartland Center for Spirituality, http://shalomplace.com; and Sacred Space accessible at http://sacredspace.ie/. Another helpful source for guided meditations is the book and CD, The Healing Oasis by Sharon Moon with Gary Sprague, composer and musician, issued by The United Church Publishing House in 1998. While these practices may not recreate for us the experience of the divine shekinah, they may in and of themselves be useful spiritual practices in our anxious age when we seem to have little or no control over our lives.

PSALM 99. According to some scholars, this is the last of a series of psalms used in the temple ritual, probably sung in two or more parts, to celebrate the enthronement of Yahweh as mythical sovereign of the universe as well as of Israel. Scholars have included Psalms 47; 93; 96-99 in this series. This ritual was thought to have been based on non-Jewish traditions adapted for use in Israel at the new year festival. Such celebrations are known to have been common in Babylonian, Ugarit and Moabite traditions. Other scholars dispute this interpretation and regard these as psalms for the sabbath rather than for the new year. On the other hand, they may reflect some specific but indeterminate historical situation. The data is insufficient to prove any of these points of view.

Most likely the psalm dates from the time of Zerubbabel at the end of the 6th century BC, when the temple was being rebuilt following the return of the exiles from Babylon. As several prophetic references indicate, there was an awakening of messianism during this period. (Haggai 2:2-9, 20-23; Zechariah 3:8; 4:8-11; 6:11-12.) Messianism and monarchy were inextricably linked in the theology of the later books of the OT and intertestamental literature.

As we have it now, the psalm celebrates Yahweh’s holiness and justice, and praises Yahweh for providential and merciful guidance throughout Israel’s history from the time of Moses onward. In vss. 6-7 there is a reference to Moses, Aaron and Samuel as priests representing the people before Yahweh and receiving from Yahweh the terms of the covenantal relationship as we have seen described in Exodus 33-34. This is no easy transaction based on special favour. Vs. 8 stipulates that it is the forgiving nature of God which maintains the relationship, while at the same time avenging Israel’s wrongdoings.

The psalm ends with a summons to worship in the sacred temple on the holy mountain of Jerusalem. In the television clips one sees of the Western Wall in Jerusalem, one can quickly discern the persistent sense of holiness and total identification which modern Israelis exhibit toward the site of the temple. I have been there and shared in the practice of praying at what is believed to be all that is left of the temple created by Herod the Great (37-4BCE). One feels a certain empathy for this attitude. Sadly, this same attitude is not extended to the magnificent Islamic mosques which tower over the site and which are just as sacred and worshipful to Moslems as the Western Wall is to Jews. Yet these holy sites have been the source of much anguish and conflict between Jews and Moslems for more than the past half century.

2 CORINTHIANS 3:12-4:2. One of the significant facets of biblical interpretation comes to the fore in this passage. Whatever its original meaning, a specific passage may be used by a later author/interpreter to make a point quite different from that intended by the original author. This was a common practice of NT authors as may seen from their frequent quotations from the only scriptures they knew, the Hebrew scriptures. Most likely they had before them the Greek translation of the Hebrew text composed in the 3rd century BCE by Jews living in Alexandria, Egypt. They freely reinterpreted their selected quotations to convey a message relevant to their own context without regard to the intent of the original passage. Their purpose was to proclaim Jesus of Nazareth as the long promised Messiah/Christ. Don’t we still do that all the time, often in polemical voice as Paul seems to have used here?

Behind this passage stands the OT lesson from Exodus 34. Paul refers directly to the time Moses covered his shining face with a veil. Because he has quite another purpose in mind, Paul saw in this story another interpretation of how the divine presence and truth are authoritatively expressed. Throughout chs. 2 & 3 Paul has been expounding the validity of his apostleship. His confidence in doing so, he claims, is dependent on the superiority of the new covenant he and other apostles preach. He makes a rather negative reference to the shekinah reflected in Moses’ face (vs.7) which is now fading because the old covenant is being set aside. That old covenant simply condemned the Israelites, it did not save them, he claims. Now, however, the new covenant justifies believers; it establishes a right relationship with God which the old covenant failed to do. He goes so far as to liken the veil over Moses’ shining face to the veil he claims lies over the minds of the people of Israel because they refuse to believe in Christ.

This may sound to us supersessionalist, if not blatantly anti-Semitic; and so it has been interpreted. Let’s not deny it as many Christians still do so to the extent of excluding faithful Jews as “the people of God.” (See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersessionism) One of the reasons Paul was so fiercely opposed by his fellow Jews was their belief that he had abandoned the sacred tradition that Israel alone was God’s chosen people. In fact, Paul was trying to say that the old covenant was not wrong, but that it was incomplete. It was but one step along the way to the full revelation of God’s nature and God’s saving love as Jesus Christ had made this known. How do we feel when radical Christian interpreters (e.g. Bishop John Spong) declare that our present understanding of the orthodox Christian tradition is just as incomplete?

The metaphor of the veil covering Moses face and so veiling the minds of believers from the truth in Christ plays an unusually large place in this passage. William Barclay had some interesting insights about this veil and how it still may affect us through prejudice, wishful thinking, fragmentary thinking, disobedience or an unteachable spirit.

Paul goes on to declare that the relationship of Christians in Corinth with God and God’s authority in their lives comes not from the commandments of Moses, but from the risen Christ who is now present with the church through the gift of the Spirit. So the church is able to speak truthfully and authoritatively for God as it proclaims the gospel. What is more, now that they (and by inference, we also) behold the presence of God fully revealed in Jesus Christ and the Spirit, we are being transformed into his likeness. This transformation is not effected by us, but by the Spirit of Jesus Christ himself.

LUKE 9:29-43. Who really knows exactly what Transfiguration means? The word itself translates the well-known Greek term, metamorphoo (English = metamorphose). One is compelled to ask not what it means, but if it really happened. Since the 2nd century CE it has been the subject of much speculative interpretation. Was it, as 2 Peter claims a verification of the Second Coming (2 Pet. 1:16-18)? Was it a misplaced tradition of a post-resurrection appearance to Peter, James and John? Was it, as Matthew 17:9 declared, a vision? Was it a kerygmatic story created by the apostolic church to teach that the messiahship of Jesus was supported by the law and the prophets?

Writing for a Gentile faith community living in a different context, Luke drew on the same Old Testament lesson from Exodus 34 as Paul had in writing to the Corinthians. He wanted to make the same point Paul made, but he said it in a very different way without the polemical attitude Paul voiced. He told this story to point out that Jesus is the one who represents the divine presence in the world and possesses divine authority and power to save. But Luke did not see Jesus as abrogating the old covenant in the same way many believe Paul had done. Along with Matthew (5:17), he saw Jesus as fulfilling the covenant witnessed to by both Moses, as representative of the original covenanted community of Israel, and Elijah, the representative of the whole prophetic witness throughout Israel’s faith history.

What is more, Luke tied this symbolic experience, so vividly recalled by the apostolic community represented by Peter, James and John, to the mission of the apostolic church in the real world where human sickness and distress abounded. The healing of the epileptic child proved that the divine presence and redeeming grace which the church proclaimed is no pious hope, but a spiritual reality breaking in upon the natural, chaotic state of a diseased and distressed world. This interpretation of the Transfiguration, recalling as it does the transfiguration of Moses and the prophetic witness to God as sovereign Lord of Israel’s faith and history, seems far more relevant to our times than Paul’s tortured polemic.

On the other hand, we must also recall that Paul and Luke had quite different purposes in mind. Paul wrote a personal communication to one of the congregations he had founded and which suffered from a serious crisis of disunity. The conflict raging in Corinth, perhaps between Jews and Gentiles as in Galatia, had not only divided the community, but threatened to destroy the very work Paul had so patiently carried out there. Paul would be of all people most surprised to find that his letter was now “holy scripture.” Luke wrote to convince a leader of the Gentile community, or a wider audience of both Jews and Gentiles, that the Christian faith was no threat to peace and welfare of the Graeco-Roman world in which they were living, but indeed its only hope for survival.

If one prefers to regard this as a credible, historical event in the life of Jesus, one must see it for what it meant to him as much as to the apostles. It confirmed Jesus in his mission and prepared him for the difficult trials that lay ahead. To quote D. M. Beck in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible (iv.687): “Luke places more emphasis on Jesus, who, facing death, found in prayer the support with him of great spiritual leaders and especially God who chose him for the way of suffering, death and resurrection.” That may well have been all that Luke sought to do.